The closure of the Andover and District Liberal Democrat Branch has stirred debate among local members and the wider community. While initial reports suggested that a large majority of local members voted to keep the branch open, Test Valley Liberal Democrat leaders have now clarified the situation following requests for transparency.
In a joint statement to Love Andover, Cllr Neil Gwynne, group leader of the Liberal Democrats at Test Valley Borough Council, and Russell Theron, Chair of the Test Valley Liberal Democrat Party, addressed three key questions raised after the announcement.
Was there a vote to retain the branch, and what was the outcome?
“Yes, a vote to close the branch did take place. In accordance with Liberal Democrat procedures and our constitution, that vote was held by the Test Valley Local Party Executive Committee – which includes several members from Andover.
“We understand that a separate vote was conducted by some members of the Andover branch; however, this was not part of the official process and does not align with our constitutional procedures.”
Who made the final decision to close the branch?
“The Executive Committee – having been confirmed and investigated with the Regional authorities – followed the correct process.”
What does this mean for representation and engagement in Andover?
“The aim has been – all along – to increase the level of engagement and support from the Test Valley party. And, in doing so, to increase the number of party members and supporters in Andover.
“The Mayoral elections coming up next year are extremely important…we want residents in all of Test Valley to fully have the same opportunity in being supported by hardworking Liberal Democrats.”
The move comes as part of a broader restructure of the Test Valley Liberal Democrat organisation. However, comments on social media and beneath the original Andover Advertiser story suggest unease among some local party members, who argue that the closure was made without their backing and have accused the Executive of “ignoring” a local vote.
Despite this, the leadership maintains that the decision was made in line with party rules and with a focus on future strategy.